Ok, thanks Patrick I will take a look at the assembly today and report back. Thanks.
Aaron On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > -1. Things look great however I noticed that the source artifact > includes the same LICENSE/NOTICE as the binary artifact. You only want > to include LICENSE/NOTICE specific for the artifact. (the jars listed > in these two files are not included in the src artifact for example, > js is included in both so it's correct to include that in the LIC/NOT > for both, etc...) > > If this is addressed I don't see any other issue that would keep me > from +1'ing the release at this point. > > Regards, > > Patrick > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This is the second release candidate for Apache Blur, version > > 0.2.0-incubating. > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > http://incubator.apache.org/blur/docs/0.2.0/release-notes.html > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending]. > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for > > convenience. > > > > Source and binary files: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/ > > > > The tag to be voted upon: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-blur.git;a=tag;h=1a1ca843409ca5d46182af7f136f2b4541f6462d > > > > Blur's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.0-incubating/KEYS >
