On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Doug Cutting <[email protected]> wrote: > Tim, > > Good question. You've made a few releases, you have 3+ active > developers, so perhaps its time to start the graduation process. > > Looking at the website, I'd prefer it better distinguish between users > downloading release tarballs and contributors getting sources from > git. For example, the "download it now" link only mentions git,
I've changed the "download it now" to point to the formal release. > the "getting started" page in the released documentation tells how to > build from git rather than from the released sources. I'm not sure what you mean. We have two different pages: [1] The "Get Involved", which typically means you want to get involved with the project. That does link to git - rightfully so, I reckon. That's getting involved with Blur the project. [2] The "Getting Started" that's a part of the release documentation. That page refers to both the official source release and the convenience binaries. That's getting started with Blur, the software, not the project. [1] - http://blur.staging.apache.org/blur/get_involved.html [2] - http://blur.staging.apache.org/blur/docs/0.2.0/getting-started.html > A best practice is to put > contributor-oriented documentation on separate pages from end-user > documentation. I've changed the label from Get Involved -> Contribute. And I've created a link to "Getting Started" directly from the main navigation. Obviously it can improve, but hopefully that clarifies it for now? --tim
