Hi Tim,
I tried to connect with some committer near by. But got reply that
this is possible only after personal meeting. He recommended to get it
signed is some upcoming cloud stack. Is it required for release as I
have uploaded public key to MIT server. I will sign jars with the
private key I am having and anybody can use this with public key I
have uploaded.

Regards,
Gagan

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Gagan Juneja <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> I have uploaded public key to MIT key server. I am writing an email to
> committers live nearby for requesting to sign my key. Will update you.
>
> Regards,
> Gagan
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hey Gagan,
>> The page Aaron linked to has tons of details but you need to publish your
>> keys to a keyserver (e.g. mit) - something like '--send-key' if you're
>> using gpg. Do you live near any other committers[1] who can sign your key?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --tim
>>
>> [1] - http://people.apache.org/map.html
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Gagan Juneja 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I have generated the key locally.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gagan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Gagan Juneja <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Thanks !
>>> >>
>>> >> Aaron can you please help me in setting up PGP keys, Web of Trust
>>> >> account,  member unix group on people.apache.org.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > I can try, Tim helped me get through this process when I went though it.
>>> >  Maybe he can jump in here.
>>> >
>>> > Where are you in the process?  Assuming that you are at the beginning you
>>> > will need to download and install a PGP tool.  I'm on OSX so I used
>>> > https://gpgtools.org/.  Make sure you follow these instructions:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#generate
>>> >
>>> > Once you have your key created someone will need to sign it.
>>> >
>>> > Aaron
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Gagan
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> > Nice. This looks good to me in general. Couple issues:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 1) "Assuming the vote passes" i'd change that to "Once the vote passes
>>> >> > on both the blur dev list and incubator general" etc....
>>> >> >
>>> >> > You can find more details on the process here:
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
>>> >> >
>>> >> > basically though it's 1) call the vote on dev list, min 72hours, if
>>> >> > that passes 2) call the vote on incubator general, if that passes
>>> >> > (wait another 72hrs, min 3 IPMC +1's, regular rules re release vote
>>> >> > (the vote needs to pass)) then you're ready to roll.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > See also:
>>> >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2) I think you also need to "release" the mvn staged artifacts as part
>>> >> > of the "roll out" process?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Patrick
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> Gagan,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Ok.  I have reviewed and edited the
>>> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/blur/HowToRelease instructions.
>>> >> >>  There are a couple of sections that still need to be written down.
>>> >> >>  However those are after a successful vote, so we have a few days.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Let us know if you need help or have questions.  Thanks!
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Aaron
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> That's great Gagan!  Thanks!  I will review them this weekend and
>>> let
>>> >> you
>>> >> >>> know.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Thanks again.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Aaron
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Gagan Juneja <
>>> >> [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>> Hi Aaron,
>>> >> >>>> I can take this up. Please give me a signal when you feel that
>>> >> >>>> How-To-Release wiki page is up to date. I have already started
>>> going
>>> >> >>>> through this page. As I am doing Apache release first time so might
>>> >> >>>> need help from your side :)
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Thanks!
>>> >> >>>> Gagan
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]
>>> >
>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>> > I believe that Blur 0.2.2 on the apache-blur-0.2 branch is ready
>>> to
>>> >> be
>>> >> >>>> > released. Tons of bug fixes, performance improvements and a few
>>> >> >>>> > enhancements are in this potential release.
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > So I would like to have someone else (that is a committer)
>>> perform
>>> >> the
>>> >> >>>> > release task this time around.  I am planning on going over the
>>> >> >>>> > How-To-Release wiki page to make sure that it is up to date.
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > For those that need the link:
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > http://wiki.apache.org/blur/HowToRelease
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > So if you have time to perform the release please respond back to
>>> >> the
>>> >> >>>> list.
>>> >> >>>> >  Thanks!
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > Aaron
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>>

Reply via email to