On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Sak, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Aaron, > > It's not CDH5 per se that is raising the risk profile but rather > Cloudera's implementation of Map Reduce 1 with CDH5. They have custom libs > built for hadoop-core, hadoop-minicluster, hadoop-client, and hadoop-test > all versioned as 2.3.0-mr1-cdh5.0.2 as well as all the MR1 daemons (NN, TT, > JT) using the hadoop2 filesystem. > I don't mind testing Blur against CDH5 if you would like... Would that help? Or no? Aaron > > -- Steve > > ________________________________________ > From: Aaron McCurry [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CDH5 MR1 > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Sak, Steve <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Has anyone gotten Blur built against Cloudera CDH5 using the MR1 > libraries > > and done any testing? How likely is it to work? I'm close to passing > the > > unit tests but the poms are a hodgepodge and our project is quickly > > approaching a decision point as to what direction to take. We were > > thinking that CDH5 MR1 would provide a medium risk option on the road to > > Hadoop 2 and Yarn but perhaps were too low in our risk assessment. > > > > We currently run hadoop2 builds CI on Apache's servers. The build run's > against hadoop 2.2.0 and I have successfully run Blur on HDP 2.1 (based on > hadoop 2.4.0). I don't mind running the tests and minicluster against CDH5 > if this will help in your decision making process. > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Blur-master-jdk7-hadoop2/ > > Thanks! > > Aaron > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > >
