+ Probably a good idea. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm starting to think the ability to specify shards on the single > table command(s) should be done by shard id's vs shard names. It > seems more reasonable to me that might have knowledge of the shards > without knowing Blur's internal naming convention. I'm essentially > suggesting we change Set<String> shardsto Set<Integer> shards... > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > --tim >
