Aaron, You are correct that #4 is fixed.
On Tue Jan 06 2015 at 10:51:54 AM Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The complete list: > > > > 1) pom file changes - seems like everyone is ok with this for 0.2.4, > > so I'll make those changes in the next day or so. > > > > I think this is complete. > > > > > > 2) documentation - there's still a bit left on the command stuff that > > I'll try to finish off in the next day or so; we also need to just go > > through the rest of the documentation and make sure it's all still > > accurate. > > > > This still needs to be finished unless we are ok with releasing it > incomplete. > > > > > > 3) Apply some changes to the IndexInput and such that improve merge > > performance. > > > > This still needs to improved a bit, but the overall solution is still > unknown. > > > > > > 4) Routing issue with the console. > > > > I think this is fixed. > > > > > > ?5) Add javadoc tags for @blur.experimental so folks using the new > > Command stuff have fair warning and we have more freedom? > > > > If we mark the command API experimental do we need to finish the docs > before release? > > Aaron > > > > > > Thanks, > > --tim > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Chris Rohr <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > We need to figure out how to fix the routing issue that came up with > the > > > console when we downgraded Jetty from 9 to 8. > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:24 AM Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> There are a few code updates from the merge testing that need to be > > >> applied. I will try to have them applied later today. > > >> > > >> On Tuesday, December 2, 2014, Tim Williams <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Ok, so we have: > > >> > > > >> > 1) pom file changes - seems like everyone is ok with this for 0.2.4, > > >> > so I'll make those changes in the next day or so. > > >> > 2) documentation - there's still a bit left on the command stuff > that > > >> > I'll try to finish off in the next day or so; we also need to just > go > > >> > through the rest of the documentation and make sure it's all still > > >> > accurate. > > >> > 3) ? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > --tim > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected] > > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> > > I have helped them out on this issue. It turns out that several > of > > the > > >> > > thread pools were configured with too many threads. I will check > > back > > >> > with > > >> > > them tomorrow to make sure that everything is still running well. > > >> > > > > >> > > Aaron > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Tim Williams < > [email protected] > > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Ok, let's crash on this issue then. Chris, do you wanna open up > a > > >> > >> JIRA issue for it? Any ideas how we might craft a test for it? > It > > >> > >> seems like it might have to be an integration test, but can you > say > > >> > >> more about the conditions that precede it? Any sorting? Any > > filters? > > >> > >> Large number of fields? Large number of column families? If you > > can > > >> > >> open up a ticket, I'm wondering if we can iterate on a test until > > we > > >> > >> find the right scenario that reproduces it or maybe you don't > know > > >> > >> enough about it quite yet? > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Thanks, > > >> > >> --tim > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Aaron McCurry < > [email protected] > > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> > >> > The issue that Chris has mentioned is the only blocker in my > > mind. I > > >> > >> would > > >> > >> > like to resolve the merge performance issue but I agree with > Tim > > >> that > > >> > >> > should not hold up the release. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Aaron > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Chris Rohr < > [email protected] > > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >> Tim, > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> Thanks for starting this list. I am cool with being the RM > for > > >> this. > > >> > >> >> I just got a new computer so I'll make sure my keys are still > > good > > >> to > > >> > >> >> go. > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> As for remaining issues: > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> 1. We are having a back pressure issue under the following > > >> scenario: > > >> > >> >> * column families are cold > > >> > >> >> * concurrent queries (more than 10) are issued against the > > cold > > >> > >> >> families > > >> > >> >> This basically makes the system unusable very quickly and > > runs > > >> the > > >> > >> >> cluster to the point where it has to be restarted. Aaron has > > been > > >> > >> >> brought into the conversation to help review things on our end > > as > > >> > >> >> well. > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> 2. The console was updated to support SSL connections, > however, > > >> there > > >> > >> >> is no way currently to actually enable ssl on Jetty through > > >> > >> >> configuration. We may want to get that done prior to the > > release. > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> Current In-work console issues that would be nice to have: > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> 1. Facets on the search tab > > >> > >> >> 2. Top in the console > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> Chris > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Tim Williams < > > >> [email protected] > > >> > <javascript:;> > > >> > >> >> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > I'd like to chart out what needs to be done to kick 0.2.4 > out > > the > > >> > >> >> > door. On core blur, I'm only aware of slow merging under > > certain > > >> > >> >> > [extreme-ish?] conditions. > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > o) I pushed a new archetype for new Commands yesterday that > > has > > >> > some > > >> > >> >> > slightly funky version bug/behavior. The archetype just > > creates a > > >> > >> >> > sample command so I think we're fine shipping with that as > is. > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > o) I think we're ok shipping with the merge weirdness > because > > >> we've > > >> > >> >> > been unable to hunt it down so far and it's pretty rock > solid > > and > > >> > only > > >> > >> >> > presents under certain circumstances. > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > o) ? > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > Also, Chris, you still cool with being RM for this one? > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > Thanks, > > >> > >> >> > --tim > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >
