Sounds reasonable to me. Having rotating RMs would also be a good idea, spread the knowledge.
Patrick On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > It's no secret that we have been working to release 0.2.4 for a very long > time. Too long. A lot of the blame for that falls to me. I have worked > to add features and stability to the project but I have not run the project > management side of things very well to date. > > We are going to change that starting now. > > I propose that we get on a monthly release cycle, the 1st of each month. > This also has the added implication that the master branch bound for > release is always stable so that we can release at the 1st of each month. > So major features should now be developed on a feature branch and merged to > master once complete. It also means that larger features will likely take > longer to produce but we should see those features more often. > > Please let me know your thoughts and suggestions. > > Thanks! > > Aaron >
