I think I would need. Set<String> excludeFields; // each string would be columnFamily.columnName. Or a Map<String, Set<String>> Boolean onlyReturnHighlightedColumns; // default to true if you don't want to change existing behaviour
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm attempting to implement search result highlighting and I'm running > into > > some problems. > > > > Every time I ask blur to highlight the search results, I get back rows > with > > 0 records. Same with fetching. > > > > I have figured out what the problem is, but I don't have a solution. > > > > Background: > > Running blur 0.2.3 > > We have extended FilteredBlurServer to remove records from the results > > based on the data in one of the columns. > > > > What I discovered is that when you ask blur to highlight search results, > it > > only returns columns that have highlighted data. Therefore our security > > filter can't see the acl column and throws away all the records. > > - Is this different in blur 0.2.4? > > - Is there any way to make blur return all the data but with highlighting > > on matching columns? > > - Maybe the Row class could have records & highlightedRecords? > > > > I think we should some options to the HighlightOptions to allow you specify > the behavior you want. Then we can make the highlighter use these > options. What options do you need? > > > > > > Assuming I can get this step working, there will be a second problem. If > > the acl column is used in a query with highlighting, it will change the > > value of the column and fail security. > > Possible solutions... > > - add a field to HighlightOptions that can specify fields to not > highlight. > > - perform highlighting after filtering > > > > Yes with the new options we should have the ability to not highlight > certain columns. > > I will look through the internals today and maybe there is a way you can > work around this issue now and we can make it better in the future. > > > > > > I appreciate any help, > > Thank You, > > Andrew > > >
