[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15000451#comment-15000451
]
Aaron McCurry commented on BLUR-446:
------------------------------------
Tim,
I don't have enough information at this point to know whether or not separate
controllers are needed. It would be nice if they weren't. Perhaps we solve
this in a slightly different way. Maybe we can have every node perform the
duties of the current controller, but add a way to disable certain nodes from
serving data if dedicated controller processes are needed. Thoughts?
> Remove the multiple shard cluster from within a single installation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BLUR-446
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-446
> Project: Apache Blur
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Blur
> Affects Versions: 0.3.0
> Reporter: Aaron McCurry
> Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> This feature creates a lot of complexity in Blur and is rarely used.
> Currently the system allows for multiple shard clusters to be online in a
> single installation. Tables can not exist outside of a single shard cluster.
> Controllers make the tables on each of the shard clusters look like one
> large table space.
> In place of this feature I would suggest that users install separate clusters
> that are chrooted in ZooKeeper to 2 different locations. The applications
> would have to manage talking to each cluster in the given application.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
