On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan < [email protected]> wrote:
> Aaron, > > I've re-worked the first-cut patch to make it more simpler. If you could go > through it when you find time, it'll be great… > I just read through the code. I like it! Thanks! Do you have any feel for performance of the cache warmer? Meaning if a shard server fails do you have any metrics on performance differences before the cache warmer vs without? Thanks. Aaron > > -- > Ravi > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks! Will do! > > > > On Wednesday, May 6, 2015, Ravikumar Govindarajan < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Done… https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-431 > > > > > > Please do review when you find time… > > > > > > -- > > > Ravi > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Ravi, > > > > > > > > Attachments are removed from the mail list. Perhaps you can create > an > > > > issue in jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR) and > attach > > > them > > > > there? Thanks! > > > > > > > > Aaron > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan < > > > > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Aaron, > > > > > > > > > > I am attaching files for your reference, with minor changes to > > > > > CacheDirectory. This is on 0.2.2… > > > > > > > > > > Changes look quite simple to plug-in to CacheDirectory & > > > BlurIndexWarmup. > > > > > Makes me quite suspicious of missing something obvious… > > > > > > > > > > Please do look at it when you find time... > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Ravi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Cool, let us know how it goes! > > > > >> > > > > >> Aaron > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan < > > > > >> [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Just so you are aware we are working to allow Blur to move > > blocks > > > to > > > > >> > > datanodes where the shards are being served > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Great. I remember that you were telling me this must be the > > correct > > > > >> > approach for locality sensitive apps on hadoop. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I am also trying the cache re-load on 0.2.2 itself.. Will update > > you > > > > >> once > > > > >> > it shapes up… > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Ravi > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
