Hi guys,

On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 11:15 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> As not everyone might be on steering-discuss yet, forwarding it here
> We can discuss it on sc-discuss then

        So let me try to do that [ I believe I'm subscribed now ]

> From: Anthony Papillion <[email protected]>
> On 10/27/2010 8:06 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> > I had posted this in the wrong mailist and intended it here.
> >
> > I have just been informed that the registration page has been removed
> > from LibO. All it took was on bug report to have it removed.

        It was removed before the first Beta; correct.

> > Did I miss something? I don't remember a good and deep debate about
> > this. Removing the registration page, in my opinion, is short-sighted.

        Personally; I prefer to have the debate framed in terms of whether we
should add something like that back.

> While it's true that it is a nuisance

        In the commenter's words - it is indeed a nuisance. Here is at least my
rational:

* Cons of registration page
        + It makes OO.o look like some shareware / marketing-ware thing
        + It clutters our startup, with extra confusing clicks
        + It has some annoying "annoy me again later" option you have
          to carefully avoid.
        + There are real privacy, data collection and storage issues
          around the data that is entered
        + LibreOffice currently has no infrastructure to register and
          store that data at all, never mind in a compliant way
        + Very many people will simply ignore it, thus giving us only a
          subset of users, and presumably those who care little for
          their privacy
        + Ubuntu had a -massive- flamewar before removing a somewhat
          more defensible dialog about something very similar, and
          currently do not ship with this dialog cf.:
                http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10044054-92.html

* Pros of registration page
        + It allows us to collect data on people that have no problems
          entering their personal information into this sort of thing
                + we could (hypothetically) use that data for something

> Maybe even just a name and state/country collector?  Removing the
> data collection point altogether will create a huge blind spot
> between us and our users.

        So - I really don't think this creates a huge blind-spot. I would be
amazed if Mirrorbrain cannot give us state/country information and
breakdown from its list of IP addresses that it re-directs for
downloads. Peter is some kind of wizard - so I suspect we can get this
now. Failing that we know our approximate geographical penetration from
the font analysis work.

        We can also get a similar set of data we can analyse geographically by
looking at hits on our link to the extensions repository.

        So - in summary ... putting this 'back' is not a free operation - it
takes real work, it also annoys real users (including some of the
commenters, and me too FWIW ;-).

        Now - the migration page - that is different, we have a plan to fix the
issues Mechtilde carefully identified there, and I need to execute on it
(working ... ;-)

        HTH,

                Michael.

-- 
 [email protected]  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


-- 
E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how 
to unsubscribe
List archives are available at 
http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

Reply via email to