Hi, > Von: Sophie Gautier <[email protected]> > An: [email protected]
> > > > Sebastian Spaeth wrote on 2010-11-01 16.36: > >> > >> Dear all, all discussions seem to hint at that the first stable release > >> of LibreOffice is going to be a 3.3.0 release. I would like to have you > >> consider a different version for the following reasons: I put it to the agenda, so that we can have some kind of "official" statement: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Agenda_2010-11-03 > > Agreed, I think we should revise the naming of our version and make > our own progression pattern (athouhg not àla Ubuntu please, I love to > learn a new English animal name every 6 month, most of the time nobody > is able to remember it ;-) and that is easy also to figure out which > version between the stable or the developer one. I'd rather continue OOo version number schema for the moment. My main reason is interoparability with extensions and third party applications. At the moment at least extensions might check for a minimum / maximum version number of the application. The application brant itself is not taken into account. To pass such tests we need (at least internally) to follow the OOo versions - and I'd not suggest to separate internal / external version numbers. We might work on this for future versions - and maybe we even must work on this, in case LibreOffice and OOo diverge a lot. regards, André -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
