On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:53 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote on 2010-12-16 11.06:
> > Ok; we are using the LGPLv3+/MPL dual for code; might be nice to keep
> > that consistent for artwork too.
> >
> > Apart from that it is an excellent idea.
> >
> > Presuambly someone needs to tweak the wiki somehow to support this
> > though (?) - Thorsten ? :-)
>
> I can do it - I just need to know the exact string. At the moment, we have:
>
> CC-by-sa-3.0 = Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
>
> What would we need in additional and "official" license title?
Oh - grief; to turn it into a big string; I would say:
CC-by-sa-LGPL-MPL = Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0
Unported, or Lesser GNU General Public License 3.0 or later version, or
Mozilla Public License 1.1
that is quite a mouthful but ... :-)
HTH,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
