Hi, Le Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:33:26 +0100, Volker Merschmann <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi, > > 2011/1/14 Stefan Weigel <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > Am 14.01.2011 17:34, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: > > > >>> [email protected] > > > >>> [email protected] > > > >>> [email protected] > > > >> -1 (I just prefer the "community" one - with volunteer there is a > >> (slight) distinction between community members that are paid by > >> someone, and those who "only" spend their spare time - at lest in > >> my brain :-))) > > > > But anyway, there will be the word "volunteer." at the beginning of > > the mail-address in any case. Wouldn´t that disturb your brain as > > well? ;-) > > > Are you kidding? I didn't understand that you will have > [email protected] . I don't understand it like that. I think it means something like [email protected] > > For the rest: I do not like any of the offered domain names, they all > are too long. I would like to see [email protected] for the > members. > > @Florian: What "irritating issues" do you mean? I think he means that anyone logging on to OpenOffice.org automatically had a default @openoffice.org and that some people started to use that alias while they were neither speaking on behalf of the project nor even regular contributors. And since there was no real membership management you could spend years away from the project and still using @openoffice.org And I think that the marketing project of OOo had quite a lot of work to "discipline" people, yet there was no effective control because addresses were essentially given to anyone. So that's what we would want to avoid, but there's a fine line between avoiding this and rebuking actual contributors. Best, Charles. > > > Bye > > Volker > -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
