Hi Andrea,
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 14:45 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> everybody (now!) knows the priority of the Document Foundation
> has been to stick to the licenses it had unilaterally chosen, before
> discussing any further options; this is perfectly understandable and
> acceptable of course.
By unilaterally chosen - the reality included private discussion with
and approval from IBM :-) but - sure ... we had spent a good while
hammering this out in advance.
> By the way, I was never approached for talks
> on this issue, but I wouldn't have had much more to say about this and I
> see no reasons for reopening issues (like licensing and copyright
> agreements) that have been superseded by history.
Thanks :-)
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
