Hi :) +1 I prefer "organisation" even if it's spelt the American way (z rather than s) rather than just "community". Communities are often thought of as being highly dis-organised which doesn't seem fair to TDF.
As Norbert said it's been fine for 10 months does it really need changing now and then back again in a couple of weeks/months? Regards from Tom :) ________________________________ From: Norbert Thiebaud <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, 12 July, 2011 10:54:59 Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] wording on TDF website On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Florian Effenberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > David Nelson wrote on 2011-07-12 03.59: >> My suggestion would be to replace the words "meritocratic Foundation, >> created by" with "meritocratic organization created by". Maybe that > > that would still create the impression that TDF is already an > organization by itself, which it legally isn't. it may not be a 'F'oundation (as in German Stiftung) yet but it certainly _is_ an 'organization' by all reasonable definition of the term. That being said... it has been 'inaccurate' for 10 month... it can certainly remain so for the few weeks left before it become finally 'accurate'. Norbert -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
