Hi David,
Am 13.07.2011 17:34, schrieb David Nelson:
I noted your change to the agenda item:
"(Italo: I do not like the way this item for discussion has been
worded, according to what has been discussed in the mailing list)"
I was invited to add an agenda item for discussion, and this is the
subject that I'm hoping that the SC will clarify, which arises from
multiple past discussions about Windows screenshots. Given the claimed
legal sensitivity of the issue, and the claimed legal liability
arising from use of Windows screenshots, I feel it is indeed a valid
matter to put before the SC for some official guidance/decisions.
I fully agree with Italo here. The discussion here at the list (and even
you comment right now) is focused on the legal implications and what the
SC would think of it. Your wording for the agenda item is much broader
and requests a general decision on the screenshots independent from
possible legal implications.
For agenda item 2: a very basic rule for questions to the SC should be
that the question should be crystal clear and not be changed half a day
before the SC's decision. At the moment I don't even know anymore what
the actual question is.
regards,
André
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
