> > I understand your concerns. However, I second Thorsten's thoughts here, > that for an entity built up as TDF, and for the way we act, the intended > meaning of § 5 is suitable. > > Let's see how things develop in the future. We can always adjust the rules > of procedure should we see things don't work as intended or expected.
+1 :) I think that guessing at what future problems might occur creates a lot of tension or at least has the potential of that. If a situation comes up where there's a clear problem, then I say modify as needed. I don't think saying "this is how others do it" is enough of a reason to change something. Best Regards, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibO QA Volunteer [email protected]
