Hello Florian, Le lundi 28 janvier 2013 à 15:22 +0100, Florian Effenberger a écrit : > Hello, > > after having a call with Thorsten, and thinking a second time about it, > I must confess that I have indeed changed my mind on this. > > The board should only veto for a very limited set of topics, mostly > legal stuff, and normally should not make use of its power as body. > > I had, like others, supported a board vote in first place, and based on > that support Charles posted this here. Thinking a second time about it > makes me feel it was a mistake, and I'm sorry for that. > > Rather, for the current discussion, let's talk between the marketing > team and the design team, at eye-level, and not with the board's > authority. >
I'm against a veto, and I have written it elsewhere. I think it would be a slap in the face of people who obviously don't deserve it. My proposal and call to vote is very different, it is to come up with an actual proposal. If we manage to solve it outside the board level, I'm the first one to be happy (and I didn't like posting the call to vote this morning); however both the timing and the fact that the initial proposal has been merged in the main branch prompted for a "Notbremse"... Best, -- Charles-H. Schulz Co-Founder & Director, The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
