Uwe: it's a shame that your tone is aggressive, and that you assume bad faith, because it undermines the point you're making, which I believe is a good one.
Board: To phrase Uwe's question differently: can we on this list expect swifter and more comprehensive minutes in future? Could inexpensive process changes be made to enable that? Thanks, Sam. On 14 May 2020 13:55:11 GMT+02:00, Uwe Altmann <o...@altsys.de> wrote: >Hi > >Am 13.05.20 um 11:54 schrieb Stephan Ficht: >> The meeting commences at 13:05 >> ... >> ends 13:09 Berlin time. > >...and the minutes then need two an a half weeks to be published? And at time >there was really nothing worth working on it? Or reporting to the community? > >Ain't you ashamed of this document of obvious idleness? There are open issues >which damage the Foundation and the community as long they are not solved and >you dare to just do nothing? Or at least to tell us nothing about what has >been discussed and/or done? > >Just to remind item 4 of the last TDF board meeting: "4. Discuss: one of the >highest Ranking in budget vote: ...what to do in general...(Lothar, All 5 >minutes, if needed shifted to the private part)" >I' afraid 5 minutes will be not good enough by half. And besides that: A shift >to the private part is not welcome at all. >-- >Mit freundlichen Grüßen >Uwe Altmann > >-- >To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org >Problems? >https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ >Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy >
