Hi Uwe, all,

Am 30.05.21 um 12:04 schrieb Uwe Altmann:
> Hi Andreas
>
> Am 29.05.21 um 08:49 schrieb Andreas Mantke:
>> could you please explain who have and who should have access to the
>> membership data (old tooling and new tooling) please...I found nothing
>> about this in the detailed specifications for the tender.
>
> First of all: This tender is based on a software specification and not
> on a description of the working processes of the MC.  The latter are
> just subject as far as it seems necessary to describe the needed
> software functionality.
>
> And this list thread should hold on that tender. Feel free to open
> another thread for anything else.
I already opened a new thread. I changed the subject of this thread (in
accordance to the usual way I know for mailing lists).
>
> You did nothing find on data access in the specs because you obviously
> read only some few pages. In short: Regulating data access is not a
> function of the tendered software but in fact a function of granting
> access to it by our SSO solution. You find that described at page 14
> of the specs - including the information who is intended to be able to
> access the software and thereby the data.

OK, got it now.

Have you already compared the details of meetings and decision making
for the board and the MC in the statutes. There are differences which
need to be considered for the access and the processing of the personal
data (of members and applicants).

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Reply via email to