Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > I would wait for an eventual vote until a few weeks after FOSDEM just in > case more questions and/or interest about the future of LOOL come up. > The attic proposal is only incidentally related to LibreOffice Online. Do you have concrete suggestions on changing the actual proposal?
> This agreement, to be drafted by our legal team in collaboration with TDF's > counsel, should be added to the proposal before voting as it should be part > of the on-boarding process for projects we intend to support. > I very strongly suggest to *not* make that mandatory for every kind of project we'd be interested in adopting. It would otherwise completely kill the onboarding of that kind of small-but-useful tools we've taken up in the years past (cppunit, libcmis, odf toolkit etc). No volunteer in her right mind would sign binding, legal agreements of that kind. Instead, it can be left to the discretion of the board to ask for more formal commitments, if it sees a need. Best, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
