Hi all,I think we finally reached a document with quite a few compromises with version 2.9, which is available in the shared folder.
There are a few elements that should be checked by our legal counsel especially from an HR/ESC relationship point of view and limitations about working on specifically mentioned projects.
Once our legal counsel evaluated the document and suggested the needed modifications we should be ready to vote it into action.
Ciao Paolo On 22/09/2022 23:37, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v So 10. 09. 2022 v 15:45 +0200:I am happy to share the folder (read-only) to the general public too, but I'd like to have Paolo's OK before I do - Paolo, is it OK for you?I'm totally fine with sharing the folder to all so that they can see how it changed over time.Thank you, it can be seen here: https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/zfoRygFbBgJZZcjI've uploaded version 2.8 with some comments. I've accepted several changes even if don't satisfy me fully but a decent compromise today is better than nothing at all. It took a very long time to get here so I hope that the long discussions haven't put off potential candidates. I believe this version (2.8) should now be sent to our legal counsel for verification and the result should be voted on. Would you agree?I've added answers to your comments as: TDF-In-House-Developers-Proposal-v2-8-Merged-answers.odt For many of them, it is just an "OK, accepted"; just few bits around the ESC are controversial or even not acceptable for me - but I've outlined those already in the call on Monday. Can you please have a look? Thank you in advance! All the best, Kendy
-- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
