Hi all, I await answers to the questions below. And it looks like if I was not the only one.
The action about the moderation of this list was in July this year extra risky because it happened during the elections of the Membership Committee and this list was the main communication medium for the candidates. Thus the action to moderate this list could also be seen as an intrusion into the election process. Because the election of the TDF bodies is an important and sensitive an intrusion into it by the election board is a substantial mistake. Regards, Andreas Am 01.12.22 um 06:50 schrieb Andreas Mantke:
Hi Thorsten, Daniel, hi all, Thorsten could you please explain in detail the invitation to the meeting on July, 8th? Who has been in the meeting, and by which medium and during which time frame? Did you document the meeting? Who signed that document? Was the document sent to All members of the board and to the MC? Was the document published? Has the document been archived at TDF archive? The above is the minimum according to par. 9 of the statutes. If this rules were not followed there is definitively no decision taken before the moderation took place. Regards, Andreas Am 1. Dezember 2022 00:52:34 MEZ schrieb Thorsten Behrens <t...@documentfoundation.org>: Hi Daniel, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote: And that does not look like a board decision to me. The vote was to document an earlier decision on Friday, July 8th, that happened via phone, messenger and chat. Mind that it was vacation time, and several directors had no immediate access to their email. Cheers, Thorsten -- Thorsten Behrens, Director, Member of the Board The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, Germany Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
-- ## Free Software Advocate ## Plone add-on developer ## My blog:http://www.amantke.de/blog