Sure = I am not talking technical specifications / Compared to Members Just give full information on the websites
it's my bad English :) Sorry Thanks Tom -Snorri -----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de tom calthrop Envoyé : mercredi 27 février 2008 19:31 À : [email protected] Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Nat Sakimura' Objet : Re: [OpenID board] CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT Hi All, I can't help but feel that this maybe a good moment to consider a "Frequently asked questions" section on the web site. The question of whether you need a contribution agreement may have a habit of repeating itself;) Tom Mike Jones wrote: > You're confusing two things. The procedures allow anyone to *implement* > OpenID specifications without signing anything. Period. Nothing to do there. > > However, the procedures require contributors to sign a contributor agreement > to participate in creating *new specifications*. This is completely > different thing. > > Beyond making sure that this information is clear to your members, I don't > believe that there's anything that OIDE needs to do here. > > Cheers, > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Snorri > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:16 AM > To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'Nat Sakimura' > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT > > Important: actually, many companies/websites are implemented OpenID without > read juridical documents (because they didn't know that exist) > > At OIDE we think to propose soon: > > A form with process during is necessary to read all document (contributor, > Members, Bylaw, IPR...) and accept a "box" exactly like a "Terms of > Service/use" during the inscription on one website. > > After manual verification (who is?) and all documents are sent within 48 > hours (in PDF and is necessary to sign it). > > What do you think? > > -Snorri > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Nat Sakimura > Envoyé : mercredi 27 février 2008 05:09 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Objet : Re: [OpenID board] CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT > > Hi. > > So does this mean that there is no document to sign to be Contributor? > How do you know that one has agreed to the IPR policy? > (Note: a contributor does not even need to be a member.) > > Regards, > > =nat > > 08/02/27 に David Recordon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> さんは書きました: > >> This is outlined in the IPR Process: >> http://openid.net/ipr/OpenID_Process_Document_(Final_Clean_20071221).pdf >> . It wouldn't hurt to streamline it into an easy to follow page or >> something though. >> >> >> --David >> >> >> On Feb 26, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Drummond Reed wrote: >> >> > I agree with Nat -- the Contribution Agreements all work in the >> > past. How >> > specifically does a new working group start its work and obtain >> > contribution >> > agreements for new work going forward? >> > >> > This is fairly urgent topic as Nat and others want to propose new >> > work and >> > get started. >> > >> > Scott, can you add that to the agenda for this Thursday's board >> > telecon? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > =Drummond >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> >> Behalf >> >> Of Nat Sakimura >> >> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 7:49 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Subject: Re: [OpenID board] CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT >> >> >> >> Since this mail is rather long, here is the excecutive summary. >> >> >> >> (0) I want to start contributing and thus sign the contribution >> >> agreement. >> >> (1) The current non-assertion agreement is only for the works of >> >> the past. >> >> (2) Therefore, it does not work for the new contributions on a new >> >> work >> >> group. >> >> (3) Which document shall I sign for making contributions? >> >> >> >> Following is the detail: >> >> >> >> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion- >> >> Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf >> >> >> >> The document is specifically for the Specifications which is defined >> >> as in section 1 (g) >> >> >> >> (g) "Specifications" means solely the indicated versions of >> >> the >> >> following documents (each of which, as of the >> >> Effective Date, is located at the indicated URL): (i) OpenID >> >> Authentication 1.1 (http://openid.net/specs/openid‐ >> >> authentication‐1_1.html);; (ii) OpenID Simple Registration >> >> Extension 1.0 (http://openid.net/specs/openid‐simple‐ >> >> registration‐extension‐1_0.html);; (iii) OpenID >> >> Authentication 2.0 >> >> - Implementer's Draft 12 >> >> (http://openid.net/specs/openid‐authentication‐ >> >> 2_0‐12.html); (v) >> >> Yadis Discovery Protocol 1.0 >> >> (http://yadis.org/papers/yadis‐v1.0.pdf); and (vi) OpenID >> >> Attribute >> >> Exchange - Draft 8 >> >> (http://openid.net/specs/openid‐attribute‐ >> >> exchange‐1_0‐08.html). >> >> >> >> Moreover, "Contribution" is defined in section 1(a) as >> >> >> >> (a) "Contributions" means any written communication made by or >> >> on behalf of Contributor before the Effective Date and intended >> >> for inclusion in a Specification. >> >> >> >> Note that Effective Date is the date of signing this agreement. >> >> >> >> So it does not include the future proposed specification at all, from >> >> what I see. >> >> To this extent, I do not think this agreement can be used to initiate >> >> a new Work Group specified in the spec. process document. In fact, >> >> none of us, including those who have signed this contribution >> >> agreement can start contributing for new things at all, if my >> >> interpretation is right (and I think I am right.) >> >> >> >> >> >> =nat >> >> >> >> >> >> 2008/2/20, Nat Sakimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> Hi all: >> >>> >> >>> I have looked at: >> >>> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion- >> >> Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf >> >>> >> >>> Looks like it is not the general case. (If I am not reading it >> >>> wrong, >> >> it >> >>> only covers "the Specifications") >> >>> >> >>> If I were to start a WG process, the contributors need to submit >> >>> Contribution Agreement as par IPR Policy. Which particular document >> >>> should I submit? >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >> >>> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> board mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >> >> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > board mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board >> >> _______________________________________________ >> board mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board >> >> > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
