Good point, Martin. +1 to doing this before IIW. =Drummond
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Martin Atkins > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:41 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Topic for this week's agenda > > Drummond Reed wrote: > > Scott and Bill: > > > > Per the thread below, the question of when we will be opening up new > Working > > Groups for specifications is starting to come up. I'm not saying there > is a > > compelling reason to do that yet for any spec other than PAPE (and the > > Trusted Exchange spec that Nat Sakimura and his team have suggested), > but I > > do think that OIDF needs to take a public stance about: > > > > a) The status of current WGs (to my knowledge it's not published > anywhere > > what WGs exist or are planned) > > > > b) The process for community members to form a WG. > > > > Can we put a short discussion about this on this week's agenda? > > > > It was my understanding that the blocker for this is that we have no > voting system through which we can hold a vote for the creation of a WG. > > Obviously that is in hand per our discussions at the last meeting. > However, I guess we could discuss an interim plan to get the first few > WGs up and running quickly. It'd be nice if these could be up and > running by IIW so that the WGs can potentially present to the community > what they've been up to. > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
