> This is what I recall as well. I definitely was the four officers of the > Board (previously elected) and Mike as the community or at-large board > member who was willing to put in the time on the executive committee.
I must have missed that call and its a shame we spent extra time on this during the last call. Sorry about that everyone. I would just as soon stick with the current officers + one at-large member (that being Mike right now). I'd also think that we'd want to make this the standard practice moving forward (such that after elections we'd vote in new officers and one at-large member and thus a new Executive Committee). I'm mostly interested in getting the process down so that after the next round of elections we have a defined Executive Committee that can work closely with the new Executive Director. Thoughts? - Scott _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
