The redline is correct. Section 7 is entirely new to this document. (It is,
however, substantially identical to the language that that board approved and
included in the retrospective IPR commitment agreement, that enabled people to
make IPR commitments to the existing specs.)
-- Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Recordon
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 11:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Daggett, David; David Daggett (K&L Gates); Geoffrey Creighton (LCA)
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Proposed reciprocity election additions to IPR
Contribution Agreements
Thanks Mike/David for doing this. Do you have a better redline of the
reciprocity statement (section 7 in the paper version), in my copy of Word it
appears that the entire section was removed and replaced versus a delta in the
wording.
Thanks,
--David
On Aug 28, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
In July we discussed adding the reciprocity election language that is in our
retrospective IPR contribution agreement to the contribution agreement for
working groups. These versions (redline and clean) that were produced by David
Daggett add that language to our existing agreements.
I'd like for us to consider adopting these changes during the board meeting
following today's.
Cheers,
-- Mike
<Paper Contribution Agr (rl 20080828).doc><Paper Contribution Agr (clean
20080828).doc><Online Contribution Agr (rl 20080828).doc><Online Contribution
Agr (clean 20080828).doc>
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
