Hey Brian,
I don't believe this captures the latest motions that Nat made.
--David
On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Brian Kissel wrote:
When: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:00 AM-6:30 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific
Time (US & Canada).
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
FYI, this is a reminder that the online vote for Nat’s four motions
will start on Friday Jan 23rd.
Followings are the proposed motions that I would like the board to
consider. There are two types: one that can take effect immediately,
and one that requires board and membership voting.
I. For immediate implementation of the current process:
One of the obstacles that we have found during the process was that
it was kind of hard to get the specs council to deliver the
recommendation in a timely fashion. It has seen some improvement
recently, but we want to make sure to continue it. Thus, I would
like to propose the following:
BE IT RESOLVED that the OIDF Committee Liason is directed to act as
the coordinator for the specification council so that specification
council create a recommendation for the membership about a formal
working group proposal within 15 days of the complete proposal being
circulated on [email protected] to comply to the current OpenID
process.
II. Improvements of curent porcess
As a longer term solution, I would like to propose the following
three motions. The first two are to make sure the timely and
effective response from the specs council, and the last one is to
protect the OpenID(TM) as well as to make it easier to create a WG
so that all the discussion will be done inside the WG and the output
is IPR clean.
BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should the
specifications council not create a recommendation for the
membership about a formal working group proposal within 15 days of
the complete proposal being circulated on [email protected], then the
proposal may proceed to a membership vote for approval.
BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should specs
council members not participate in the discussion of two consecutive
working group proposals, they will be deemed to have resigned, and
new specs council members who are committed to participating in the
process will be appointed to replace them.
BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
agreed to amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft
may claim OpenID trademark until it is ratified to be an
implementor's draft status or full specification status.
<mime-attachment.ics>_______________________________________________
board-private mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
