+1 Especially, #5 is important in terms of greater adoption. Also, I suppose it is a sub-item of #1, but streamlining OIDF's operation is also important. For example, we need to create Logo, Trademark, and Domain name usage policy, permission to use TM workflows, etc.
=nat On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Johannes Ernst <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:25, Brian Kissel wrote: > >> Johannes, do you want to take a stab at 5 key goals for 2009 - agreed, >> overall goals, not just marcom. Would be great if we could focus on them. >> Scott, Chris, David, and I were on a call yesterday with RWW and if we had >> those 5 key points, we could have hammered them home. We need to make sure >> that they are aggressive yet achievable, as I'm sure we'll be measured by >> our progress relative to them come 2010 ;-) >> > > Well, if it was up to me the list would be something like this: > > 1. OIDF is organizationally and financially sound for the long term and for > the benefit of the entire global community. > Evidence: permanent staff, further increasing corporate support, > well-planned/coordinated activities are taking place world-wide. > > 2. The OpenID brand is clearly defined, known and considered valuable by > the general public (not just techies), and backed by an effective trademark > regime. > Evidence: corresponding results of a brand survey > > 3. The user experience issue has been solved in theory and practice. > Evidence: User experience is virtually identical at all sites supporting > OpenID; no major gripes by actual/would-be adopters. > > 4. OpenID is broadly used. > Evidence: Transaction volume is commensurate with the deployed identities. > > 5. OpenID-related innovation is driven by the needs of the marketplace, not > just technical coolness > Evidence: Substantial, active involvement in a broad range of working > groups by mainstream businesses > > > Obviously, if one breaks those down, there are many activities that need to > happen on the way to be able to reach those objectives. I don't want to > downplay them -- many of them are not easy -- but it may help to first > figure out what the objectives are and then to discuss how to get there, > instead of the other way around. > > > > > Johannes Ernst > NetMesh Inc. > > > > http://netmesh.info/jernst > > > > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
