On 01/27/2009 01:30 AM, Brian Kissel:
If this is the only way, than I'd would vote for it. Considering that there will be an added benefit for others...but also here the cons and pros have gone around already.Seems there are a couple of questions to answer with login at OpenID.net:1. What will work the best consistently for all our existing and new potential members (intuitive, reliable, inclusive, cost effective, etc.). Seems everyone is in favor anything that achieves these objectives.2. How important is it that login is neutral (not favoring any OP, not provided by any vendor). There has been discussion on both sides of this topic, not only for login but for the OpenID wiki (currently at pbwiki), OpenID.net on Wordpress, hosting documents at Google docs, etc.3. How much are we willing to spend to fix it and keep it operating properly. The current estimate that is on the table from Refresh Media is that it will take $1500 to $2000 to fix the original generic type in box UX to accommodate i-names and directed identity.Given that there appears to be a diversity of opinion, would it be worthwhile to use our polling tool to allow the membership to weigh in? If not, we can just give the green light to Refresh Media to get started.
Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> Jabber: [email protected] <xmpp:[email protected]> Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> Phone: +1.213.341.0390
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
