The problem with this proposal is that it removes the community's voice from
the spec creation process. Our members should always be given the option to
vote NOT TO create a working group as well as the option to vote TO create one.
Otherwise, a working group can be created by a very small group of insiders,
without the community serving as a check & balance.
The current procedure, by design, always gives the community a voice, and the
final say. I believe we got this principle right the first time.
-- Mike
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Brian Kissel
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OpenID board] Allen Tom's proposal on WG formation
Seems this has some support and it would require a board and membership vote to
implement, correct? Is there a motion to the board to make this change and a
second? If so, we can start the notification clock for a board vote.
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
David Recordon
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [step2] OpenID UI Extension - Draft 0.1 (formerly
known as the Popup Extension)
+1 (and minus the UX list)
On Feb 24, 2009, at 11:34 PM, Drummond Reed wrote:
+1.
=Drummond
________________________________
From:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Breno de Medeiros
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:37 AM
To: OpenID user experience
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [step2] OpenID UI Extension - Draft 0.1 (formerly known as the
Popup Extension)
+1
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:04 AM, George Fletcher
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
+1
Allen Tom wrote:
I think that approval by the specs-council should be sufficient without a
membership vote to start a WG. Alternatively, if the specs-council does not
recommend approval, then the WG proposers could then appeal their case to the
full membership.
Allen
Nat Sakimura wrote:
Guys: If you think the initial membership voting requirement is an
overkill, please raise your voice. I think this board can act swiftly
to look at it.
=nat
_______________________________________________
user-experience mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/user-experience
_______________________________________________
user-experience mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/user-experience
--
--Breno
+1 (650) 214-1007 desk
+1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)
MTV-41-3 : 383-A
PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
_______________________________________________
user-experience mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/user-experience
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3889 (20090225) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
