please don't send messege again thank u
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: 3/9/2009 7:00:02 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: board Digest, Vol 27, Issue 5
Send board mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of board digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Sponsoring Transparency Camp? (Bill Washburn)
2. openid.org causing confusion (Martin Atkins)
3. Re: openid.org causing confusion (Chris Messina)
4. Re: openid.org causing confusion (David Recordon)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Washburn <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Sponsoring Transparency Camp?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Chris, David, Don, Brian
Just to let you know, I have had a few interesting interactions in the past 6-9
months with a few people I've known over the years who work the Washington
world. Depending on what you think the interest levels and opportunities may
be I think it could be possible to get serious about intra-federal-govt needs
as well as all the e-govt "opportunities". And then there are the specific
medical and health services things gaining some recent traction.
cheers,
-bill
________________________________
From: Chris Messina <[email protected]>
To: board <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 10:20:25 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Sponsoring Transparency Camp?
To follow up on the event, it was a rather large success, I'd say, with
representatives from OMB, GSA, State, DOD and other acronymatic orgs.
Dave and I presented on the DiSo Project and had a round-table discussion on
OpenID for the government, which was received very well.
The government seems eager to learn more about OpenID, and I think our
attendance (and Dave's/OIDF's sponsorship) was money well spent.
Episode 31 of TheSocialWeb.tv provides an overview of our experience:
http://thesocialweb.tv/
Chris
2009/2/23 David Recordon <[email protected]>
This weekend is a BarCamp style event in DC called Transparency Camp by the
Sunlight Foundation and some government agencies. Chris is attending and I'll
most likely attend (attendance is closed at this point so unfortunately Don
wouldn't be able to make it) though I'm wondering if the OpenID Foundation
would want to sponsor it since Chris will be there and I might?
Sponsorships start at $50 and getting OpenID better in front of government in a
semi more formal manner seems like a good idea. If nothing else, does anyone
object if I personally given an in-kind sponsorship for the Foundation? Would
anyone object to the Foundation itself sponsoring the event for $150?
http://transparencycamp.eventbrite.com/
Thanks,
--David
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
Open Web Advocate-at-Large
factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org
citizenagency.com # vidoop.com
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://openid.net/pipermail/board/attachments/20090309/faa0d52f/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:29:18 -0700
From: Martin Atkins <[email protected]>
Subject: [OpenID board] openid.org causing confusion
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In a bunch of places I see people thinking that openid.org is somehow
the "main", "default", "primary" or only OpenID provider.
Clearly this is what the OpenID trademark is supposed to protect the
OpenID brand against.
What can be done about this?
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:01:51 -0700
From: Chris Messina <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] openid.org causing confusion
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Agreed.
This is something that we must address, and has been on our radar.
We largely need to develop a reasonable trademark policy, similar to
Jabber's perhaps, the affords productive and non-misleading uses of the mark
without imperiling the integrity of things are OFFICIALLY sanctioned or
sponsored by the OIDF.
Thanks for raising this issue again.
If you could provide us with specific examples off-list where you're seeing
confusing portrayals of the relationship between OpenID or OIDF and
third-parties, that would be very helpful.
Thanks,
Chris
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Martin Atkins <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> In a bunch of places I see people thinking that openid.org is somehow the
> "main", "default", "primary" or only OpenID provider.
>
> Clearly this is what the OpenID trademark is supposed to protect the OpenID
> brand against.
>
> What can be done about this?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
Open Web Advocate-at-Large
factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org
citizenagency.com # vidoop.com
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://openid.net/pipermail/board/attachments/20090309/4c7d93b4/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:59:20 -0700
From: David Recordon <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] openid.org causing confusion
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
DelSp="yes"
Yes, this is something that I'm hoping Don will be able to drive to
completion over the next few months. We have the needed skeleton of a
plan, but need the time to get the work done.
--David
On Mar 9, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Chris Messina wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> This is something that we must address, and has been on our radar.
>
> We largely need to develop a reasonable trademark policy, similar to
> Jabber's perhaps, the affords productive and non-misleading uses of
> the mark without imperiling the integrity of things are OFFICIALLY
> sanctioned or sponsored by the OIDF.
>
> Thanks for raising this issue again.
>
> If you could provide us with specific examples off-list where you're
> seeing confusing portrayals of the relationship between OpenID or
> OIDF and third-parties, that would be very helpful.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Martin Atkins <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
> In a bunch of places I see people thinking that openid.org is
> somehow the "main", "default", "primary" or only OpenID provider.
>
> Clearly this is what the OpenID trademark is supposed to protect the
> OpenID brand against.
>
> What can be done about this?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Messina
> Citizen-Participant &
> Open Web Advocate-at-Large
>
> factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org
> citizenagency.com # vidoop.com
> This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://openid.net/pipermail/board/attachments/20090309/08e053c8/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
End of board Digest, Vol 27, Issue 5
************************************
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
