(Moving this to the public list.)
You're right Brian, this is the sort of thing for the working groups
to decide and the Foundation/Board to help facilitate from a process/
legal perspective. I'll reply to the thread on General@ explaining
the working group process.
I think it's also worth another thread about the somewhat mythical
"2.1" spec which I'll start on the Specs@ list, driving the community
to make a decision on if we want 2.1 to really be a small
"maintenance" spec or continue waiting for things like discovery (see http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2009-June/002886.html)
to shake out.
--David
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brian Kissel <[email protected]>
Date: June 9, 2009 10:47:26 AM PDT
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [board-private] FW: [OpenID] Authorized Voting for Email
Like Identifiers
Reply-To: [email protected]
FYI, I don't think it's in our charter for the board to make
decisions on these kinds of things, it's for the individual working
groups and spec committees, correct? The OIDF and board can
facilitate the process, but don't think we've historically defined a
technology specification roadmap, correct?
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Santosh Rajan
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 9:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenID] Authorized Voting for Email Like Identifiers
I would like to hear an answer to this post from the OpenID foundation
board.
Santosh Rajan wrote:
A Vote authorized by the foundation must be conducted to decide
whether
Email Like identifiers will be in the core spec of OpenID 2.1.
If that is not possible the foundation must officially announce
whether
Email like identifiers will be in the Core Spec of 2.1.
This will greatly help people decide, how and on what to spend
their time
and effort, and will also ensure that their time and effort does
not go to
waste.
I also see an urgency in this matter because ideally I would like
to see
2.1 come out soon because there will be Wave servers being released
by the
last quarter of the year. If we can have 2.1 before that we will be
in a
position to offer OpenID as an alternative. Otherwise I am sure XMPP
authentication will grow into a Federated authentication.
Here is a link to show the latest plans of Google Wave.
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/2acef1d32b4def06?pli=1
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/2acef1d32b4def06?pli=1
-----
Santosh Rajan
http://santrajan.blogspot.com http://santrajan.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Authorized-Voting-for-Email-Like-Identifiers-tp23940149p23946788.html
Sent from the OpenID - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4141 (20090609) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4142 (20090609) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4142 (20090609) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
board-private mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
