On 07/10/2012 03:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 07/10/2012 02:23 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/09/2012 11:15 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: >> >>>> there is no connection between being a maintainer in a sub >>>> project and joining the board. >> >> I was forgetting that the project leads who were made part of the >> initial Board was not the norm: >> >> "A few domain leaders from projects. Not all projects have board >> representation so that community members can work to fill some of >> these seats related to projects. Not every project has to be on the >> board. They do however need to participate in the coordination mail >> lists." >> >> http://www.ovirt.org/governance/board/ >> >> However, there is a meaningful connection. Becoming a maintainer is a >> sign of individual merit, and a collection of such merit is a >> prerequisite to being voted on to the Board. >> >> Similarly, a project is likely to appreciate having one or more >> maintainers who are Board members. > > So far, I think the board really hasn't done that much, no? I think > there's been very few votes and the votes probably weren't all that > controversial. > > I think erring on the side of having greater participation will > increase the likelihood that the board actually has debates and that > interesting topics are brought forward. > > I'm very much in favor of bringing in as many people as possible > within reason.
Also, it is fine to say that we will become stricter as the project matures. Carl. _______________________________________________ Board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
