On 9/5/12 10:57 AM, "Mike Burns" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Given some of the difficulties we've had recently with planning and >getting releases pulled together, I'd like to propose we have a new role >in the Project. > >Project Manager > >Responsibilities: > >Maintain Schedule >Run weekly meeting >Coordinate with project maintainers on dates, features, etc >Ensure that docs and release materials are ready for release >Final say on what goes into a release >Tracking new features >Tracking action items > >This person should be empowered to make decisions for the project (based >on input from maintainers, but final call is theirs). > >As for choosing this person, it could be done via general election on >email or an IRC meeting. I'd suggest having someone do it for a limited >timeline, maybe 2 or 3 releases, max, then someone else takes over. > >Any thoughts, suggestions, comments? Mike, I'm definitely in favor of a PM. I like the 2-3 term requirement, but if they want to serve again it should be an option (subject to re-election). Jon _______________________________________________ Board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
