On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:57:07PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/20/2012 02:27 PM, Garrett LeSage wrote: > >On 09/20/2012 08:17 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > >> The top page and the Download page don't even tell what licence > >>is applicable, IMHO that crucial information should be presented to > >>the user between the time it hits the home page and the time he's told > >>how to install it on Fedora 17. > > > >That's a great point. > > > >Is it enough to mention "ASL2.0" in the footer and link to a licensing > >page, like the current oVirt.org website does? Or should we say more? > > IMHO, the license matters at earliest when you're downloading (so > not on the front page), and probably only when you're making changes > (the "Developer" or "Contributor" pages). The important thing is to
I think you're optimistic there. Lot of people won't download stuff if they can't tell the Licence upfront, not just me :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ Board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
