On 07/02/2013 02:33 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi Liran, > > It appears I am alone in having concerns about this so I would go ahead > and request the project license as you proposed.
FWIW, you can *always* figure I have concern about using non-FLOSS tools in an open source project. I like learning from history and past mistakes. Bottom line is, if people like us (and our engineering and product managers) don't step up to the line to deliver open solutions for our development needs, then we continue to fall behind closed-but-ready-today solutions in the drive toward deliverable dates. Every decision to purchase a closed solution instead of writing or fixing an open solution hurts the entire ecosystem. It's behavior we can expect at the corporate layer, but it shouldn't push its way up to the community project layer. - Karsten > Thanks, > Dave. > > On 06/25/2013 12:42 PM, Liran Zelkha wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I have searched for open alternatives, but they do not provide full view of >> the application, as is needed in the profiling session of the engine we are >> conducting. >> The only alternative I can see is buy JProfiler licenses (or any other >> commercial profiler) and let internal RedHat team members use it when >> profiling. >> Please advise. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jon Benedict" <[email protected]> >> To: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]>, "Liran Zelkha" <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:12:40 PM >> Subject: Re: JProfiler >> >> I have no issue with this. >> > -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
