On 07/30/2013 09:06 AM, Doron Fediuck wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: [email protected] > | To: [email protected] > | Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 4:48:17 PM > | Subject: Re: JProfiler opensource license > | > | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > | Hash: SHA1 > | > | On 07/30/2013 02:42 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote: > | > Hi, In order to get an opensource license for our developers, we > | > need to place a JProfiler logo[1] in our front page, with a > | > link[2]. > | > | Not sure if promoting proprietary software for free on the homepage of > | ovirt is a good idea. Can we discuss adding them to the > | partners/sponsor/members page as an alternative? > | > | Jan > | > > Added Liran. > Can you please check with them if the partners/sponsor/members page > will work?
To provide some historical context, that is the exact purpose of the sponsors and supporters page as I understood it when we were creating the project governance and putting the website together. http://www.ovirt.org/Sponsors_and_supporters JimJag or Carl might be able to shed more light here. The key is that we are not giving preferential treatment to any one sponsor over another. All strategic supporters have their logos in alphabetical order, achieved through making a much higher level of commitment to oVirt than providing a no-cost license for an open source project. On that page is the supporters section, which is where the JProfiler logo is appropriate - their providing a no-cost license is supporting the project. - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
