> Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:31:01 -0500
> From: "John Keck" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] 6.6.20 and work scheduling
> To: "Paul D. Buck" <[email protected]>, "Richard Haselgrove"
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: BOINC Developers Mailing List <[email protected]>, John McLeod
> <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <49ac83b79e5d462cbe9dc89290e34...@tsi5200w>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> I definitely agree with Paul; I don't see a good reason to test for a CPU
> reschedule more than once a minute and 5 to 10 minutes seems more reasonable
> with the exception of a resource going idle. In the best case we are wasting
> cycles that could be used by the science app. In the worst case we kill
> tasks that have trouble dealing with multiple stops and restarts.
>
> john
I'd suggest:
a) Download finishes (more work has arrived - we need to check deadlines)
b) Task completes (we have a free resource)
or if none of the above every 5 minutes
MarkJ
The new Internet Explorer 8 optimised for Yahoo!7: Faster, Safer, Easier.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
