Sounds good to me, too. But if it's just used for the Apps, why not link the _app portion of libboinc into libboinc_api?
Bernd David Anderson wrote, On 6/11/09 6:39 PM: > Sounds good to me > > Eric J Korpela wrote: > >> Hi everyone, I'm thinking of splitting libboinc into one library of >> things needed by an app and another of things that would only be >> needed on the server or the boinc client. The main problem I'm having >> right now is crypt.o make it necessary for things apps with libboinc >> to also be linked with libcurl/crypt/crypto/ssl (or whatever other >> library is providing the RSA routines). Apps shouldn't need to know >> about encryption. >> >> Anyone have a problem with splitting boinc into libboinc_app and >> libboinc? Anyone have better names for them? >> _______________________________________________ >> boinc_dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. >> > > _______________________________________________ > boinc_dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev > To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and > (near bottom of page) enter your email address. > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
