Thanks, Nicolas. I am thinking the same way now, especially on anansi, each URIs return different number of sub URIs, which varies because of the changing world other. It was really not good to evaluate contributions from a client by FLOPS.
--- On Sun, 9/13/09, Nicolás Alvarez <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Nicolás Alvarez <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] Credits for download and submission on a task > To: [email protected] > Cc: "Kunsheng Chen" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 5:43 AM > El Sáb 12 Sep 2009 17:14:52 Kunsheng > Chen escribió:nd submission (even if the > > since my project is using non-cpu-intensive and the > FLOPS varies > > dramatically by each task, so it is not good to > define credit in wu nor to > > put <grant-claimed-credit> in validator. > > If your project is non-cpu-intensive, you shouldn't be > granting credits based > on FLOPS at all. You should probably give credits based on > how much network > traffic your web crawling causes or similar. > > -- > Nicolas > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
