I'm not sure if that is related, but after the update server started sending 2 tasks, while config.xml has max_wus_in_progress = 1, max_wus_to_send = 1. We only need one task to be sent, as we're non-cpu-intensive: 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1183 [PID=22950] Request: [USER#1] [HOST#1] [IP 88.222.120.231] client 6.6.36 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1209 [PID=22950] [send] DCF=100.000000; setting to 10 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1209 [PID=22950] [send] effective_ncpus 2 max_jobs_on_host_cpu 2 max_jobs_on_host 2 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1209 [PID=22950] [send] effective_ngpus 0 max_jobs_on_host_gpu 999999 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1209 [PID=22950] [send] Not using matchmaker scheduling; Using EDF sim 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1210 [PID=22950] [send] CPU: req 1.00 sec, 0.00 instances; est delay 23507.58 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1210 [PID=22950] [send] work_req_seconds: 1.00 secs 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1210 [PID=22950] [send] available disk 2.14 GB, work_buf_min 0 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1210 [PID=22950] [send] active_frac 0.995735 on_frac 0.820234 DCF 100.000000 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1213 [PID=22950] [send] [HOST#1] is reliable 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1213 [PID=22950] [send] set_trust: error rate 0.100000 > 0.050000, don't trust 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1216 [PID=22950] [send] est. duration for WU 57323: unscaled 0.06 scaled 0.75 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1217 [PID=22950] [send] candidate succeeds 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1229 [PID=22950] [send] [HOST#1] Sending app_version pinger 1 117 ; 1.62 GFLOPS 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1237 [PID=22950] [send] est. duration for WU 57323: unscaled 0.06 scaled 0.75 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1237 [PID=22950] [HOST#1] Sending [RESULT#75239 pinger_59695_0] (est. dur. 0.75 seconds) 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1244 [PID=22950] [send] est. duration for WU 57324: unscaled 0.06 scaled 0.75 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1244 [PID=22950] [send] candidate succeeds 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1252 [PID=22950] [send] [HOST#1] Sending app_version pinger 1 117 ; 1.62 GFLOPS 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1259 [PID=22950] [send] est. duration for WU 57324: unscaled 0.06 scaled 0.75 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1260 [PID=22950] [HOST#1] Sending [RESULT#75240 pinger_59696_0] (est. dur. 0.75 seconds) 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1268 [PID=22950] [send] in-progress job limit exceeded; 2 >= 2 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1272 [PID=22950] Sending reply to [HOST#1]: 2 results, delay req 7.00 2009-09-20 16:26:30.1277 [PID=22950] Scheduler ran 0.265 seconds
2009/9/18 David Anderson <[email protected]> > I see the problem. Please check out latest and try again. > -- David > > > Rytis Slatkevičius wrote: > >> Seems like I spoke too soon. It does not work when max_total_results is >> set to 1 - no results for new workunits are created, and workunit >> immediately goes to error_mask=8 (too many total results). >> >> I'm not sure why, but (int)items.size() is 1 when there are no results >> yet. >> > -- Rytis Slatkevičius +370 670 77777 ICQ 270359185; MSN [email protected]; GTalk [email protected]; Skype rytis.s (text only) _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
