Lynn W. Taylor wrote: > Martin wrote: > >>> >>>> credits = k * cobblestones >>> ... and I believe that K is 1. >> >> "k" can be anything depending on: >> >> what a project does that is different to s...@h; > > You're missing the one critical point. > > Cobblestones are *defined*. > > There is a *definition* that says "credit is claimed based on this > formula...." > > If a cobblestone is a cobblestone, then "k" MUST BE EXACTLY 1. > > If a cobblestone isn't a cobblestone, then we're talking about something > else. > > The Autoflops script takes something that isn't cobblestones, and > converts it to something that is.
I'm arguing that the 'credits' that we actually see reported are not really 'cobblestones'. What we see is some "fudge-factor * s...@h-flops-count" that variably adds up to approximately the 'expected' cobblestones. The variable nature of the processing for s...@h due to the AR dependence of the s...@h-wus compounds the inaccuracies and problem still further. Regards, Martin -- -------------------- Martin Lomas m_boincdev ml1 co uk.ddSPAM.dd -------------------- _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
