I don't understand what you mean. Simulation lets you study the interactions of long/short jobs, multithread jobs, GPU jobs, multiple projects, etc., quickly and with quantitative and reproducible results. Anything involving the real BOINC client doesn't have these properties.
[email protected] wrote: > It would be good if we had a suite of tests to run CPU schedulers through > and a proposed CPU scheduler change could be tested quickly. I proposed > setting this up as the "BOINC" project tasks. The memorex in this case > could get us answers about the effectiveness much faster than live does. > The problem is that the edge conditions do not happen frequently. Most of > the time on most machines any CPU scheduler will work. It is only > sometimes that there is a major problem where some task will be reported > weeks late, or a resource is ignored for a day or two... > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
