It's a BOINC server experiment; email problems to me. BTW: the new system selects among CUDA alternatives (cuda, cuda23, cuda_fermi) not on the basis of how fast they're expected to run, but rather how fast they actually have run, on average, on that particular host. Who knows, some GPUs might be able to run either cuda or cuda23, and run cuda faster.
However, this scheme can get stuck in a local minimum for a host: it might initially send some cuda23 jobs which for some reason run very slowly. Then it would switch to cuda, and potentially never use cuda23 again. Any ideas about this? -- David Richard Haselgrove wrote: >> I'll look into this. >> Beta is running some new/experimental server software right now, >> and it may do some odd things. >> Please report any other stuff like this. >> >> -- David > > What's the official reporting line on this? > > Is it a project experiment, with feedback via messages boards? > > or a BOINC experiment, with feedback via this mailing list? > > Either way, I've just posted some bad-behaviour logs in the message board > thread Claggy linked - I can duplicate them here if you want, but I'd prefer > not to. > > > _______________________________________________ > boinc_alpha mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_alpha > To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and > (near bottom of page) enter your email address. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
