As Travis has noted he has a host that is basically obtaining tasks and not returning them at all ... this too needs to be considered as a failure and I don't think that never returned tasks are considered to be failed.
On May 27, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Lynn W. Taylor wrote: > Seems to me that the really fast methods of catching a broken host > aren't very good, and the good methods aren't very fast. > > Does BOINC need fast? > > On 5/27/2010 7:19 PM, Josef W. Segur wrote: >> I certainly agree, and even were it a perfect method of finding problem >> hosts the best method of minimizing their damage to the project is >> uncertain. Your inputs along that line have seemed very good to me. > _______________________________________________ > boinc_dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev > To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and > (near bottom of page) enter your email address. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
