I checked in the server change (if a request reports already-reported results, always resend lost results).
This will make its way into s...@home in a week or two. -- David On 11-Aug-2010 10:37 AM, Josef W. Segur wrote: > Indeed, that would be a good client feature, but should also be applied > ONLY when the failed request asked for work. I believe most such failed > requests producing lost tasks actually get an HTTP error 500 rather than > a timeout, perhaps that could also be considered. > > With the delays involved in getting client changes adopted, which may be > even longer for 6.12.x than earlier series because so many users dislike > the Manager changes, I hope the simpler and quicker server-side change > using detection in sched_result.cpp will also be implemented. It should > usually be redundant information to the client change if both are > implemented, but reported results are handled before the work request so > there need be no difficulty there. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
