On 4/12/11 12:23 , Bernd Machenschalk wrote: > I propose that the client should actually keep the "canonical" list of > OpenCL devices, and a BOINC API function (e.g. > boinc_get_opencl_device_id(int,...)) should be called in the application > to map the --device argument to the actual OpenCL device id.
That should solve the "how to pass the non-integer OpenCL device ID to the science app" question. Now we "just" need to figure out how to get to the consistent mapping across frameworks. Maybe we should post a feature request for CUDA like Rom did for OpenCL. Both frameworks should return a unique vendor-independent device ordinal, e.g. the PCI ID... Oliver _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
