I also notice the default behavior requiring the ATI runtime for CAL apps was changed with a default of requiring the AMD runtime for CAL apps. I don't know if that's deliberate or not.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Eric J Korpela <[email protected]> wrote: > We apparently have two ways of expressing ATI drivers versions as integers. > > ati_version_int() is located in coproc.h and us use by the ATI plan > classes in schedule customize. > and returns major*10000000 + minor*10000 + release. > > In plan_class_spec.cpp we have it coded as... > major*1000000 + minor*10000 + release > which shifts the major version down by a digit. > > Is there a reason we aren't being consistent? The difference has > caused problems for me. Would using ati_version_int() in all places > cause problems for other projects? _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
